Moral Queasiness & The ICJ Ruling

 
Source: Middle East Eye “U.S. doubles down on dismissing genocide claim despite ICJ ruling

If you look up “moral queasiness” in the dictionary you’ll likely see a picture of some U.S. government official or other spinning support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Above, we see how Security Council spokesperson John Kirby looked when journalists asked at a White House press briefing on January 26 about whether the ICJ ruling would affect U.S. policy. 

Short answer: not at all.

Reactions to the ICJ ruling have ranged from squirming while delivering weasel words to thundering jeremiads, such as this one from Shahid Bolsen of Middle Nation which includes his bottom line: “Anything that discredits western colonial institutions is a good thing.”

My friend Janet Kobren put together this nifty side by side comparison chart to help us sort through the provisions the ICJ ordered versus those South Africa asked them to order.

I’ve previously shared former UK ambassador Craig Murray’s reporting from the courtroom which was valuable as he was THE ONLY press person in the room. Now comes his analysis, “Has International Law Survived, or Has the Western Political Class Killed Itself?”

That the ICJ has not affirmed Israel’s right to self-defence is perhaps the most important point in this interim order. It is the dog that did not bark. The argument which every western leader has been using is spurned by the ICJ. [emphasis mine]

No wonder the White House spox is squirming.

Moderates found the ICJ ruling encouraging despite the fact that its opening paragraph condemned Hamas but nowhere in the document was there mention of the thousands of Palestinians held in Israel’s prisons. You know, the prisoners that Hamas wants to swap for the hostages taken on October 7.

In case U.S. taxpayers weren’t thoroughly nauseated yet, the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine (UNRWA) was defunded by the western axis of evil for supporting Hamas. 

As Palestinians in Gaza are literally starving to death! Many see the timing as a ploy to distract from the ICJ ruling.

Not to worry, though. Court cases against Israel and also the U.S. for supporting Israel’s genocide abound. Here’s news of a promising suit filed in on behalf of surviving family members heard in federal court in California last week:

If 11,000 Gazan children slaughtered in four months while Biden and Congress cheer from the sidelines doesn’t induce moral queasiness, there’s probably not much hope for humanity. Will Israel and the U.S. refrain from unleashing the horror of nuclear weapons? Do government officials of those nations have a shred of conscience left to inform this existential decision?

Who’s Meddling Now?

https://www.seacoastonline.com/elections/results

As the old (circa 2000) saying goes, the election’s not over until your brother counts the votes. In this case, the New Hampshire primary isn’t over until we find out how many of the “unprocessed write-in” plus “other write-in” votes are counted to see if “Ceasefire” pulled in 20.5k votes or fewer than that. Of total votes cast, that would be 20.3% or slightly more than 1 out of 5.

Now do you see why Democrat Shenna Bellows, Maine’s Secretary of State, is trying to kick Donald Trump off my state’s ballot?

The crocodile tears of Trump haters ignore so many things, like the steadily eroding mind of the incumbent, and the steadily escalating mediocrity of Democratic machine candidates. Unpopular president in office? No problem. Just skirt the primaries and don’t hold a nominating process. This is to ensure that you nominate a candidate unappealing to the majority of voters in your party.

Because who cares what voters want? As in 2016, the liberal press has long since signaled that our corporate overlords would prefer Trump as the next celebrity spokesman who explains their decisions to us.

That way they can continue to fan the flames of Russophobia as the U.S./NATO loses its proxy war in Ukraine and Europe lurches toward fascism.

But wait — maybe we won’t see a tally of those 20.5k write-in votes, because Israel doesn’t want us to. Seeing a large number there would be evidence of the deep unpopularity of its genocide on Gaza. 

Democratic Majority for Israel PAC letter source on Twitter

Never mind the millions upon millions of world citizens shutting down ports to Israeli shipping, or interrupting Biden’s campaign speeches, or blocking roads to demand an immediate ceasefire and opening Gaza to receive shipments of humanitarian aid before its surviving children starve to death.

Hey Israel, guess what? If you have to have your agents in the U.S. send a letter like that, or suppress pro-Palestinian content on social media platforms — you are losing. 

Unlike Donald Trump. I’m not a fan but, at this particular juncture in the decline of U.S. empire, he’s the candidate that doesn’t have the blood of Gaza’s children on his hands.